{"id":40244,"date":"2021-11-03T16:24:43","date_gmt":"2021-11-03T21:24:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/?p=40244"},"modified":"2021-11-03T19:20:44","modified_gmt":"2021-11-04T00:20:44","slug":"liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/","title":{"rendered":"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A mais recente edi\u00e7\u00e3o do \u00cdndice Chapultepec de Liberdade de Imprensa e de Express\u00e3o nas Am\u00e9ricas, da Sociedade Interamericana de Imprensa (SIP, na sigla em espanhol), registrou uma melhoria de 4,2 pontos na m\u00e9dia dos 22 pa\u00edses avaliados no continente. Em 2021, a m\u00e9dia do indicador atingiu 55,6 pontos, contra 51,4 no ano anterior, numa escala de 0 a 100.<\/p>\n<p>O panorama geral mais positivo vem com resultados ruins de tr\u00eas dos maiores pa\u00edses da regi\u00e3o, Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil, que foram os que perderam mais pontos no ranking.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_40253\" style=\"width: 530px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-40253\" class=\"wp-image-40253 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Indice_Chapultepec_2021_Portuguese.png\" alt=\"Tabela comparativa 2020\/2021 do \u00cdndice Chapultepec\" width=\"520\" height=\"523\" srcset=\"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Indice_Chapultepec_2021_Portuguese.png 520w, https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Indice_Chapultepec_2021_Portuguese-298x300.png 298w, https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Indice_Chapultepec_2021_Portuguese-150x150.png 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 520px) 100vw, 520px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-40253\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Tabela comparativa 2020\/2021 do \u00cdndice Chapultepec<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>O pior resultado \u00e9 o da <a href=\"https:\/\/www.indicedechapultepec.com\/argentina.html\">Argentina<\/a>, que perdeu 23,9 pontos e despencou 12 posi\u00e7\u00f5es no ranking continental. O pa\u00eds havia sido classificado na segunda posi\u00e7\u00e3o no ano anterior e agora est\u00e1 em 14\u00ba entre os pa\u00edses analisados.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA pr\u00e1tica do jornalismo na Argentina sofreu uma forte deteriora\u00e7\u00e3o das condi\u00e7\u00f5es durante o per\u00edodo em an\u00e1lise. A pandemia e a longa quarentena imposta pelo governo nacional serviram de desculpa em muitas ocasi\u00f5es para coibir a liberdade dos jornalistas. A isto se acrescentam o <em>lawfare<\/em> instigado pelos mais altos n\u00edveis de governo, a cria\u00e7\u00e3o de \u00f3rg\u00e3os de controle para supostamente combater a desinforma\u00e7\u00e3o, e a justi\u00e7a como elemento de intimida\u00e7\u00e3o,\u201d diz o <a href=\"http:\/\/www.indicedechapultepec.com\/indice\/2\/informes.pdf\">relat\u00f3rio sobre o pa\u00eds<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Um relat\u00f3rio do Foro de Jornalismo Argentino (Fopea, na sigla em espanhol) j\u00e1 havia detectado um <a href=\"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/ataques-jornalistas-2020-argentina\/\">aumento de 41% nos casos de ataques a jornalistas<\/a> no pa\u00eds em 2020. O \u00edndice da SIP cobre o per\u00edodo que vai de julho de 2021 a agosto de 2020.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs elei\u00e7\u00f5es legislativas de 2021 [em 14 de novembro] podem enviar um sinal ao governo sobre a necessidade de moderar o discurso de confronto com a m\u00eddia jornal\u00edstica. A modera\u00e7\u00e3o nas restri\u00e7\u00f5es decorrentes da pandemia permitir\u00e1 retomar o curso normal do trabalho jornal\u00edstico,\u201d analisa a SIP.<\/p>\n<p>J\u00e1 no <a href=\"https:\/\/www.indicedechapultepec.com\/mexico.html\">M\u00e9xico<\/a>, a piora est\u00e1 associada ao recrudescimento da viol\u00eancia contra jornalistas. O pa\u00eds perdeu 5,8 pontos no \u00edndice da SIP e caiu cinco posi\u00e7\u00f5es, ocupando a 16\u00aa coloca\u00e7\u00e3o. O relat\u00f3rio critica a falta de medidas concretas de prote\u00e7\u00e3o de jornalistas e garantias ao exerc\u00edcio da liberdade de imprensa.<\/p>\n<p>S\u00f3 em 2021, j\u00e1 foram assassinados <a href=\"https:\/\/articulo19.org\/periodistasasesinados\/\">sete jornalistas no pa\u00eds<\/a>, segundo a Artigo 19, igualando o n\u00famero de casos de 2020. Os casos mais recentes s\u00e3o os do fotojornalista <a href=\"https:\/\/www.animalpolitico.com\/2021\/10\/muere-fotoperiodista-alfredo-cardoso-secuestrado-baleado\/\">Alfredo Cardoso<\/a>, morto em 31 de outubro, e do diretor da revista Jovel,<a href=\"https:\/\/elpais.com\/mexico\/2021-10-29\/asesinado-de-un-disparo-el-periodista-fredy-lopez-arevalo-en-san-cristobal-de-las-casas.html\"> Fredy L\u00f3pez Ar\u00e9valo<\/a>, em 28 de outubro.<\/p>\n<p>Num caso emblem\u00e1tico, o diretor do site Noticias Minuto a Minuto e Panorama Pac\u00edfico TV, <a href=\"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/news\/antes-de-seu-assassinato-jornalista-mexicano-estava-em-contato-com-rsf-para-implorar-protecao-as-autoridades\/\">Gustavo S\u00e1nchez Cabrera<\/a>, havia solicitado diversas vezes ajuda do Mecanismo Federal de Prote\u00e7\u00e3o a Jornalistas diante das amea\u00e7as que vinha sofrendo. Mas o suporte prometido n\u00e3o chegou a tempo e ele foi morto em 16 de junho.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOs elevados n\u00edveis de inseguran\u00e7a que existem no pa\u00eds continuam a afetar o exerc\u00edcio do jornalismo e nota-se que algumas a\u00e7\u00f5es do ambiente executivo afetam negativamente o exerc\u00edcio da liberdade de express\u00e3o de jornalistas e outros atores pol\u00edticos relevantes,\u201d diz o relat\u00f3rio da SIP, em refer\u00eancia aos ataques provenientes do pr\u00f3prio presidente mexicano, Andr\u00e9s Manuel L\u00f3pez Obrador.<\/p>\n<p>O relat\u00f3rio cita as <em>ma\u00f1aneras<\/em>, como s\u00e3o conhecidas as entrevistas coletivas matutinas concedidas por Obrador na qual ele \u201cdesqualifica e estigmatiza os meios de comunica\u00e7\u00e3o, os jornalistas ... que criticam publicamente as a\u00e7\u00f5es do governo ou que apontam as suas omiss\u00f5es.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>De forma similar ao M\u00e9xico, o <a href=\"https:\/\/www.indicedechapultepec.com\/brasil.html\">Brasil<\/a> perdeu 5,6 pontos no \u00edndice, mas manteve a 19\u00aa coloca\u00e7\u00e3o no ranking, \u00e0 frente apenas de Venezuela, Cuba e Nicar\u00e1gua. Segundo a SIP, o maior e mais populoso pa\u00eds da Am\u00e9rica Latina passa por um processo hist\u00f3rico de enfraquecimento das institui\u00e7\u00f5es democr\u00e1ticas, nas quais se incluem os meios de comunica\u00e7\u00e3o, que se acelerou com a partir das elei\u00e7\u00f5es de 2018.<\/p>\n<p>Na ocasi\u00e3o, \u201co ent\u00e3o deputado federal Jair Bolsonaro, na \u00e9poca do Partido Social Liberal (PSL), venceu a disputa com um discurso de vi\u00e9s autorit\u00e1rio, sendo a imprensa um de seus alvos preferidos de ataques e ofensas,\u201d diz <a href=\"https:\/\/www.indicedechapultepec.com\/indice\/19\/informes.pdf\">o relat\u00f3rio<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>A SIP chama a aten\u00e7\u00e3o para a produ\u00e7\u00e3o de e difus\u00e3o de <em>fake news <\/em>e a dissemina\u00e7\u00e3o de discurso de \u00f3dio na internet e destaca que, nos dois casos, grupos vinculados direta ou indiretamente ao presidente da Rep\u00fablica est\u00e3o sendo investigados.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA a\u00e7\u00e3o sistem\u00e1tica de grupos organizados para difundir a desinforma\u00e7\u00e3o, controlar os fluxos de informa\u00e7\u00e3o e incentivar a subvers\u00e3o da ordem democr\u00e1tica. A suspeita, sob investiga\u00e7\u00e3o, da rela\u00e7\u00e3o entre grupos deste tipo e o poder executivo. \u00c9 neste contexto que devem ser vistas as amea\u00e7as do poder executivo e os epis\u00f3dios de agress\u00e3o de Bolsonaro e seus aliados contra os jornalistas,\u201d diz a SIP.<\/p>\n<p>De modo oposto, o \u00edndice Chapultepec registra avan\u00e7os significativos na liberdade de imprensa e express\u00e3o no continente. O maior destaque positivo \u00e9 a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.indicedechapultepec.com\/dominicana.html\">Rep\u00fablica Dominicana<\/a>, que ganhou 30,9 pontos no \u00edndice e passou da 14\u00aa para a 4\u00aa posi\u00e7\u00e3o no ranking geral.<\/p>\n<p>No pa\u00eds caribenho, o avan\u00e7o est\u00e1 diretamente associado \u00e0 mudan\u00e7a de governo ocorrida em agosto de 2020, com a posse do presidente Luis Abinader, do Partido Revolucion\u00e1rio Moderno, encerrando 16 anos do governo do Partido da Libera\u00e7\u00e3o Dominicana.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cJornalistas cr\u00edticos do governo derrotados nas urnas ... viram como as amea\u00e7as contra eles, feitas por funcion\u00e1rios e apoiadores do regime anterior, deixaram de ser um perigo para sua pr\u00e1tica profissional. A renova\u00e7\u00e3o que atingiu a esfera congressional e parte do judici\u00e1rio redefiniu o cen\u00e1rio da m\u00eddia do governo,\u201d diz o <a href=\"https:\/\/www.indicedechapultepec.com\/indice\/14\/informes.pdf\">relat\u00f3rio<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Jamaica, Equador, Bol\u00edvia, Estados Unidos e Panam\u00e1 tamb\u00e9m melhoraram significativamente os seus indicadores de liberdade de imprensa, avan\u00e7ando pelo menos dez pontos cada um.<\/p>\n<p>No topo do ranking, apenas dois pa\u00edses s\u00e3o considerados sem restri\u00e7\u00f5es \u00e0 liberdade de imprensa e de express\u00e3o: Uruguai, que lidera o levantamento, e Chile, que vem logo a seguir. Os dois acumulam mais de 80 pontos no \u00edndice. No entanto, a SIP alerta para a precariza\u00e7\u00e3o do trabalho de jornalistas uruguaios e a incerteza sobre o processo constituinte chileno como potenciais riscos a serem observados nos dois pa\u00edses.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A mais recente edi\u00e7\u00e3o do \u00cdndice Chapultepec de Liberdade de Imprensa e de Express\u00e3o nas Am\u00e9ricas, da Sociedade Interamericana de Imprensa (SIP, na sigla em espanhol), registrou uma melhoria de 4,2 pontos na m\u00e9dia dos 22 pa\u00edses avaliados no continente. O panorama geral mais positivo vem com resultados ruins de tr\u00eas dos maiores pa\u00edses da regi\u00e3o, Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil, que foram os que perderam mais pontos no ranking. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":40307,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1219],"tags":[1425,1560,1435,1394,1383],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-40244","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-liberdade-de-imprensa-pt-br","tag-argentina-pt-br","tag-bolivia-pt-br","tag-chile-pt-br","tag-mexico-pt-br","tag-uruguai-pt-br"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.6 (Yoast SEO v27.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP - LatAm Journalism Review by the Knight Center<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP Liberdade de Imprensa. Latin American Journalism Review by The Knight Center at The University of Texas at Austin.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_BR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP Liberdade de Imprensa. Latin American Journalism Review by The Knight Center at The University of Texas at Austin.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LatAm Journalism Review by the Knight Center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-11-03T21:24:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-11-04T00:20:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Featured-Image-Press-Freedom-Index.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"507\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"340\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"J\u00falio Lubianco\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@jlubianco\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@LatAmJournalism\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"J\u00falio Lubianco\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/articles\\\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/articles\\\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"J\u00falio Lubianco\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d9517de765982788cd8378b5a229e3dd\"},\"headline\":\"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-03T21:24:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-04T00:20:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/articles\\\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1105,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/articles\\\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/Featured-Image-Press-Freedom-Index.png\",\"keywords\":[\"Argentina\",\"Bol\u00edvia\",\"Chile\",\"M\u00e9xico\",\"Uruguai\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Liberdade de Imprensa\"],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/articles\\\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/articles\\\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\\\/\",\"name\":\"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP - LatAm Journalism Review by the Knight Center\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/articles\\\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/articles\\\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/Featured-Image-Press-Freedom-Index.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-03T21:24:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-04T00:20:44+00:00\",\"description\":\"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP Liberdade de Imprensa. Latin American Journalism Review by The Knight Center at The University of Texas at Austin.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/articles\\\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/articles\\\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/articles\\\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/Featured-Image-Press-Freedom-Index.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/Featured-Image-Press-Freedom-Index.png\",\"width\":507,\"height\":340,\"caption\":\"Featured Image Press Freedom Index\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/articles\\\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/\",\"name\":\"LatAm Journalism Review\",\"description\":\"Digital magazine on journalism in Latin America\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"LatAm Journalism Review\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/knight-latAm-review-logo.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/knight-latAm-review-logo.svg\",\"width\":\"1024\",\"height\":\"1024\",\"caption\":\"LatAm Journalism Review\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/LatAmJournalism\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d9517de765982788cd8378b5a229e3dd\",\"name\":\"J\u00falio Lubianco\",\"description\":\"J\u00falio Lubianco studied journalism at Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF). He began his career on the local desk at Jornal do Brasil, in 2003. He was a reporter, assignment editor and managing editor at R\u00e1dio CBN. He has a Master\u2019s degree in media and communication from the London School of Economics (LSE), with a scholarship from the Journalists of Vision program. He is a professor of journalism at PUC-Rio. He won the Imprensa Embratel award in 2007, the Alexandre Adler award in 2008, and is a two-time winner of the Tim Lopes Award for Investigative Journalism, in 2009 and 2014. J\u00falio Lubianco estudi\u00f3 periodismo en la Universidad Federal Fluminense (UFF). Comenz\u00f3 la carrera en 2003, en el diario Jornal do Brasil. Fue reportero, editor y editor ejecutivo en R\u00e1dio CBN. Hizo su maestr\u00eda en medios de comunicaci\u00f3n en London School of Economics (LSE), becado por el programa Jornalistas de Vis\u00e3o. Es profesor del curso de periodismo de PUC-Rio y es presentador del podcast de BRIO, que trata sobre periodismo, carrera, mercado y tecnolog\u00eda. Gan\u00f3 los premios Imprensa Embratel (2007), Alexandre Adler (2008), y en dos oportunidades el Tim Lopes de Periodismo Investigativo (2009 y 2014). J\u00falio Lubianco estudou jornalismo na Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF). Come\u00e7ou a carreira em 2003, no caderno Cidade do Jornal do Brasil. Foi rep\u00f3rter, chefe de reportagem e gerente de jornalismo na R\u00e1dio CBN. Fez mestrado em m\u00eddia e comunica\u00e7\u00e3o na London School of Economics (LSE), com bolsa do programa Jornalistas de Vis\u00e3o. \u00c9 professor do curso de jornalismo da PUC-Rio e apresenta o podcast do BRIO, que discute jornalismo, carreira, mercado e tecnologia. Venceu os pr\u00eamios Imprensa Embratel, em 2007, o Alexandre Adler, em 2008, e duas vezes o Tim Lopes de Jornalismo Investigativo, em 2009 e 2014.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/julio-lubianco\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/jlubianco\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/latamjournalismreview.org\\\/pt-br\\\/articles\\\/author\\\/julio-lubianco\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP - LatAm Journalism Review by the Knight Center","description":"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP Liberdade de Imprensa. Latin American Journalism Review by The Knight Center at The University of Texas at Austin.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/","og_locale":"pt_BR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP","og_description":"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP Liberdade de Imprensa. Latin American Journalism Review by The Knight Center at The University of Texas at Austin.","og_url":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/","og_site_name":"LatAm Journalism Review by the Knight Center","article_published_time":"2021-11-03T21:24:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-11-04T00:20:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":507,"height":340,"url":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Featured-Image-Press-Freedom-Index.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"J\u00falio Lubianco","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@jlubianco","twitter_site":"@LatAmJournalism","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"J\u00falio Lubianco","Est. reading time":"5 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/"},"author":{"name":"J\u00falio Lubianco","@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/#\/schema\/person\/d9517de765982788cd8378b5a229e3dd"},"headline":"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP","datePublished":"2021-11-03T21:24:43+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-04T00:20:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/"},"wordCount":1105,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Featured-Image-Press-Freedom-Index.png","keywords":["Argentina","Bol\u00edvia","Chile","M\u00e9xico","Uruguai"],"articleSection":["Liberdade de Imprensa"],"inLanguage":"pt-BR"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/","url":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/","name":"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP - LatAm Journalism Review by the Knight Center","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Featured-Image-Press-Freedom-Index.png","datePublished":"2021-11-03T21:24:43+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-04T00:20:44+00:00","description":"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP Liberdade de Imprensa. Latin American Journalism Review by The Knight Center at The University of Texas at Austin.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-BR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-BR","@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Featured-Image-Press-Freedom-Index.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Featured-Image-Press-Freedom-Index.png","width":507,"height":340,"caption":"Featured Image Press Freedom Index"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/liberdade-imprensa-sip-2021\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Argentina, M\u00e9xico e Brasil t\u00eam os piores retrocessos no \u00edndice de liberdade de imprensa da SIP"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/#website","url":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/","name":"LatAm Journalism Review","description":"Digital magazine on journalism in Latin America","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pt-BR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/#organization","name":"LatAm Journalism Review","url":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-BR","@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/knight-latAm-review-logo.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/knight-latAm-review-logo.svg","width":"1024","height":"1024","caption":"LatAm Journalism Review"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/LatAmJournalism"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/#\/schema\/person\/d9517de765982788cd8378b5a229e3dd","name":"J\u00falio Lubianco","description":"J\u00falio Lubianco studied journalism at Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF). He began his career on the local desk at Jornal do Brasil, in 2003. He was a reporter, assignment editor and managing editor at R\u00e1dio CBN. He has a Master\u2019s degree in media and communication from the London School of Economics (LSE), with a scholarship from the Journalists of Vision program. He is a professor of journalism at PUC-Rio. He won the Imprensa Embratel award in 2007, the Alexandre Adler award in 2008, and is a two-time winner of the Tim Lopes Award for Investigative Journalism, in 2009 and 2014. J\u00falio Lubianco estudi\u00f3 periodismo en la Universidad Federal Fluminense (UFF). Comenz\u00f3 la carrera en 2003, en el diario Jornal do Brasil. Fue reportero, editor y editor ejecutivo en R\u00e1dio CBN. Hizo su maestr\u00eda en medios de comunicaci\u00f3n en London School of Economics (LSE), becado por el programa Jornalistas de Vis\u00e3o. Es profesor del curso de periodismo de PUC-Rio y es presentador del podcast de BRIO, que trata sobre periodismo, carrera, mercado y tecnolog\u00eda. Gan\u00f3 los premios Imprensa Embratel (2007), Alexandre Adler (2008), y en dos oportunidades el Tim Lopes de Periodismo Investigativo (2009 y 2014). J\u00falio Lubianco estudou jornalismo na Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF). Come\u00e7ou a carreira em 2003, no caderno Cidade do Jornal do Brasil. Foi rep\u00f3rter, chefe de reportagem e gerente de jornalismo na R\u00e1dio CBN. Fez mestrado em m\u00eddia e comunica\u00e7\u00e3o na London School of Economics (LSE), com bolsa do programa Jornalistas de Vis\u00e3o. \u00c9 professor do curso de jornalismo da PUC-Rio e apresenta o podcast do BRIO, que discute jornalismo, carreira, mercado e tecnologia. Venceu os pr\u00eamios Imprensa Embratel, em 2007, o Alexandre Adler, em 2008, e duas vezes o Tim Lopes de Jornalismo Investigativo, em 2009 e 2014.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/julio-lubianco\/","https:\/\/x.com\/jlubianco"],"url":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/articles\/author\/julio-lubianco\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40244","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40244"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40244\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40256,"href":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40244\/revisions\/40256"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40307"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40244"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40244"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latamjournalismreview.org\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=40244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}